導(dǎo)語：Bush's speech on Marriage Protection Amendment一文來源于網(wǎng)友上傳，不代表本站觀點(diǎn)，若需要原創(chuàng)文章可咨詢客服老師，歡迎參考。

英語演講稿

Goodmorning.Nextweek,theUnitedStatesSenatewillbegindebateonaconstitutionalamendmentthatdefinesmarriageintheUnitedStatesastheunionofamanandwoman.OnMonday,Iwillmeetwithacoalitionofcommunityleaders,constitutionalscholars,familyandcivicorganizations,andreligiousleaders.They''''reRepublicans,Democrats,andindependentswho''''vecometogethertosupportthisamendment.Today,IwanttoexplainwhyIsupporttheMarriageProtectionAmendment,andwhyI''''murgingCongresstopassitandsendittothestatesforratification.

Marriageisthemostenduringandimportanthumaninstitution,honoredandencouragedinallculturesandbyeveryreligiousfaith.Agesofexperiencehavetaughtusthatthecommitmentofahusbandanda公務(wù)員之家版權(quán)所有wifetoloveandtoserveoneanotherpromotesthewelfareofchildrenandthestabilityofsociety.Marriagecannotbecutofffromitscultural,religious,andnaturalrootswithoutweakeningthisgoodinfluenceonsociety.Government,byrecognizingandprotectingmarriage,servestheinterestsofall.

Inourfreesociety,peoplehavetherighttochoosehowtheylivetheirlives.Andinafreesociety,decisionsaboutsuchafundamentalsocialinstitutionasmarriageshouldbemadebythepeople--notbythecourts.TheAmericanpeoplehavespokenclearlyonthisissue,boththroughtheirrepresentativesandattheballotbox.In1996,CongressapprovedtheDefenseofMarriageActbyoverwhelmingbipartisanmajoritiesinboththeHouseandSenate,andPresidentClintonsigneditintolaw.Andsincethen,votersin19stateshaveapprovedamendmentstotheirstateconstitutionsthatprotectthetraditionaldefinitionofmarriage.Andtoday,45ofthe50stateshaveeitherastateconstitutionalamendmentorstatutedefiningmarriageastheunionofamanandawoman.Theseamendmentsandlawsexpressabroadconsensusinourcountryforprotectingtheinstitutionofmarriage.

Unfortunately,activistjudgesandsomelocalofficialshavemadeanaggressiveattempttoredefinemarriageinrecentyears.Since2004,statecourtsinWashington,California,Maryland,andNewYorkhaveoverturnedlawsprotectingmarriageinthosestates.AndinNebraska,afederaljudgeoverturnedastateconstitutionalamendmentbanningsame-sexmarriage.

ThesecourtdecisionscouldhaveanimpactonourwholeNation.TheDefenseofMarriageActdeclaresthatnostateisrequiredtoacceptanotherstate''''sdefinitionofmarriage.Ifthatactisoverturnedbyactivistcourts,thenmarriagesrecognizedinonecityorstatemighthavetoberecognizedasmarriageseverywhereelse.ThatwouldmeanthateverystatewouldhavetorecognizemarriagesredefinedbyjudgesinMassachusettsorlocalofficialsinSanFrancisco,nomatterwhattheirownlawsorstateconstitutionssay.Thisnationalquestionrequiresanationalsolution,andonanissueofsuchprofoundimportance,thatsolutionshouldcomefromthepeople,notthecourts.

AnamendmenttotheConstitutionisnecessarybecauseactivistcourtshaveleftourNationwithnootherchoice.TheconstitutionalamendmentthattheSenatewillconsidernextweekwouldfullyprotectmarriagefrombeingredefined,whileleavingstatelegislaturesfreetomaketheirownchoicesindefininglegalarrangementsotherthanmarriage.Aconstitutionalamendmentisthemostdemocraticsolutiontothisissue,becauseitmustbeapprovedbytwo-thirdsoftheHouseandSenateandthenratifiedbythree-fourthsofthe50statelegislatures.

Asthisdebategoesforward,wemustrememberthateveryAmericandeservestobetreatedwithtolerance,respect,anddignity.Allofushaveadutytoconductthisdiscussionwithcivilityanddecencytowardoneanother,andallpeopledeservetohavetheirvoicesheard.AconstitutionalamendmentwillputadecisionthatiscriticaltoAmericanfamiliesandAmericansocietyin公務(wù)員之家版權(quán)所有thehandsoftheAmericanpeople,whichisexactlywhereitbelongs.Democracy,notcourtorders,shoulddecidethefutureofmarriageinAmerica.

Thankyouforlistening.